Changes in Issues in Lawsuits Concerning Pollution Caused by Chemical Substances

In the case of environmental pollution caused by chemical substances such as Minamata Disease, if a lawsuit is filed by a person who suffered environmental pollution without improving the state of environmental pollution, and if a lawsuit is filed after a considerable period of time has elapsed since the state of environmental pollution was improved within a certain period of time, it is considered that the latter is likely to be the main issue in the lawsuit.

This is because in the case of pollution-related diseases caused by chemical substance exposure, the process of pollution-related disease differs between those caused by high or short-term exposure to chemical substances and those caused by long-term exposure to low or late-term exposure. It is thought that the facts necessary to prove that pollution-related diseases are affected will vary. In the case of long-term (delayed) pollution-related diseases, the time elapsed from the last exposure to the causal substance of pollution-related diseases will be longer than that of the final exposure to the causal substance, and the facts necessary to prove the causal relationship between the exposure to the causal substance and the conditions of the pollution-related disease patients at the time of filing the lawsuit will increase.

However, in litigation, because of the impact of the previous judgment in the same type of litigation, some of the potential issues will not become apparent, and in practice, the issues in litigation will be limited to the issues that have not been decided in the previous type of litigation. Accordingly, it may be accurate to assume that the main issues actually differ. Concerning the Minamata Disease lawsuit, Toshihiro Ochi, 2nd Edition of the Environmental Litigation Law, pp. 122-131 (Japan Review Company, 2020) considered the same kind of case.

最近の記事
人気の記事
おすすめの記事
  1. 那須雪崩事故~公立高校の部活時の登山事故と指導教員個人の責任

  2. 定年後再雇用時の賃金と定年前の賃金について

  3. 同一根拠法の処分の取消訴訟における異なる原告適格の判断と判例変更

  4. 行政処分に対する取消訴訟の原告適格が認められる範囲について

  5. 外廊下の水たまりは民法717条1項の瑕疵となるのでしょうか

  1. 法律上の期間、期限など日に関すること

  2. 職務専念義務違反とは?~義務の内容、根拠、問題となるケースなど

  3. スノーシューツアーの雪崩事故におけるガイドの刑事責任~ニセコ雪崩事故

  4. 公序良俗違反とは?~その意味、具体例、法的効果と金銭返還請求など

  5. 解雇予告の30日前の数え方と夜勤の労働時間の計算-労働基準法の日と時間

  1. 配置転換は拒否できるのでしょうか?

  2. 日和田山転落(クライミング)事故にみる山岳会での登山事故の法的責任

  3. 登山事故の分類と民事訴訟について

  4. 山の頂、稜線が県・市町村の境界と一致しない例と理由、帰属の判断基準

  5. 公序良俗違反とは?~その意味、具体例、法的効果と金銭返還請求など

関連記事